The New York Times presents Paris 2024 as a major organisational success: a Seine opening ceremony without serious incident, massive but discreet security, and top-level competition at iconic sites. The paper acknowledges high cost and some controversies — Seine water quality, budget debates — but judges France restored Olympic prestige after Tokyo and contested Beijing. The angle is a successful global event that strengthens Paris's international image.

Le Monde covers the closing of the Games with pride and lucidity: French medal records, street celebrations, but also RER delays, taxpayer cost tensions and a difficult pre-Olympic political context. The daily highlights the opening ceremony as a unifying moment while questioning concrete legacy from temporary infrastructure and the capital's ability to absorb such visitor influx without lasting friction.

Al Jazeera acknowledges Paris 2024's sporting and scenic success but places the event in a broader global frame: uneven visibility for African and Arab athletes, tickets out of reach for part of the local public, and Franco-Qatari relations in the background — Doha having hosted the World Cup two years earlier. The outlet questions the Western mega-event model and notes the Games remain economically and medially dominated by major powers.

TASS focuses mainly on podiums, records and Russian athletes under a neutral flag — an IOC constraint the agency presents as political injustice. Paris is described as welcoming on the sporting level, but coverage stresses Western double standards: Russia excluded while a European host is celebrated. Opening ceremony controversies are secondary to results and debate on Olympic neutrality.

Xinhua highlights the Chinese delegation — medals in swimming, diving, gymnastics and table tennis — and salutes Paris as a competent host for an event of this scale. The agency implicitly compares largely praise-filled Western coverage of France to criticism of Beijing in 2022 on security, environment or human rights. For Xinhua, Paris 2024 confirms Olympic soft power mainly benefits Western hosts in international media narrative.

The New York Times presents the strait closure as Iranian wartime escalation after U.S.–Israeli strikes in late February. Tanker traffic falls near zero, Brent passes $100, and dozens of commercial ships are attacked. The paper condemns strikes on merchant traffic and remains sceptical that a June framework will quickly restore normal shipping.

Le Monde reports the same hard numbers but stresses the diplomatic context: a paralysed Hormuz on one side, Washington's parallel blockade of Iranian ports on the other. A mid-June protocol is announced and Brent eases, yet shippers stay cautious while the strait remains mined and unstable.

Al Jazeera puts Gulf populations and seafarers first: a de facto closed strait, at least 46 ships hit, rising energy prices and local shortages across the Arab world. A June deal opens a window, but the outlet warns the region could remain hostage to a lasting Iran–West standoff.

TASS portrays the Hormuz crisis as the consequence of U.S.–Israeli aggression: an Iranian blockade, counter-strikes and a global oil shock. Moscow denounces Western blockades on Iranian ports and asks why Iranian responses are condemned while Western actions are downplayed.

Xinhua refuses to reduce the crisis to oil prices alone. The agency calls for restraint, respect for maritime law and a comprehensive political settlement — not merely a technical exit negotiated between Washington and Tehran.

The New York Times reports a new market-cap milestone for Nvidia, driven by insatiable demand for AI training chips. The piece links the surge to record quarterly results and massive spending by Microsoft, Google and Amazon. The paper stays cautious about a possible bubble but calls Nvidia structurally dominant.

Le Monde describes Nvidia as the world's top котируемой company crossing a new symbolic threshold in June 2026. It notes GPUs at the heart of the AI race while questioning whether a valuation now exceeding several major economies' GDP is sustainable. Financial and geopolitical angle: European dependence and chip export tensions.

Al Jazeera covers the surge as a turning point in the digital economy but stresses inequality: Silicon Valley hoards gains while technology importers pay the bill. Gulf sovereign funds see an investment opportunity; other observers see an AI hype bubble.

TASS presents Nvidia's record as a symptom of US tech dominance boosted by sanctions and export controls. Moscow also sees speculative excess: with Chinese rivals blocked on the most advanced chips, the market overvalues an actor central to Washington's strategy.

Xinhua acknowledges Nvidia's commercial success but frames it in the semiconductor trade war: US restrictions have strengthened the company while accelerating China's push for self-reliance. The agency warns against overvaluation and calls for fairer global competition.

The NYT on Operation Absolute Resolve: US special forces captured Maduro in Caracas on 3 January 2026, flown to New York. Not guilty plea on narcoterrorism; Congress debates legality; Trump says US will help run Venezuela.

Le Monde on the 2-3 January night operation: strikes, Fort Tiuna capture, Manhattan indictment. International law questions, no congressional authorization.

Al Jazeera: Trump vows to run Venezuela and its oil; Rodríguez demands Maduro's release. Caracas rallies, imperialism debate.

TASS denounces armed aggression and disguised coup; illegal abduction of a head of state.

Xinhua condemns violation of Venezuelan sovereignty; calls for UN Charter and non-interference.